This article is about Globalization, but focuses on the technology that is changing the "art world". "Globalization and technology are forcing artist, curators, and museum directors to rethink the world of American Art". After this quote they explain that they need to start rethinking American Art because new art collectors are 'emerging' from all over, pulling away from the American and European arts. Then this article brushes by the topic of "high art" and how after World War II the United States starting getting very into the art world. After words it explains how artist like Andy Warhol and Roy Litchenstein "...appropriated imagery from popular culture like Campbell's soup cans and comic book strips in their work, blurred the lines between high and popular culture." What this says to me is that this two artist used their amazing, different artwork to change the views and bring together genres of art.
This was one of the more interesting articles I read. It's basically going off of Presidential candidate Barrack Obama's speech, not directing towards India or it's software program. At the beginning of this article it says that four years ago another presidential candidate John Kerry gave a speech about his opinion on outsourcing, which was anti outsourcing. "...And it was also enough to open debate on what Obama's stance could mean to the Indian information technology services industry, which still earns around 60% of it's business from the world's largest economy, if he were elected president..." This quote confused me a little bit, but if I understand it correctly it means if Obama is elected president he would let India receive 60% of the profits they make, it order to help their economy, but we still get our fair share, 40%.
Click here to view the website I used!
This article seemed to me to be too long and more than what I need right now, but I found the first part "Globalization" to be a little unhelpful. First of it described the 'term' of globalization "one of the most fashionable buzzwords of contemporary, political and academic debate..." I thought that was probably the only useful things because it doesn't really describe what globalization is, just what 'things' go with it. I didn't read on to this page because I was afraid that the rest would just be as unhelpful as the first.